The RomeReport
 
Previous Posts
TV Star by Association
Live from YouTube
Al Gore's Impact
On line or In line?
Movie recipes
Whitney and RPI
Missy's album release!
The Heat
Tetris records et al.
Whitney's famous too!
 
Archives
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
 
Blog Roll
RomeReport: Movies
Me and Maffre
Jimmy and Freda
Adventures in South America
Booberella
Z-Ro in The City
Mia All Up In Yer Face
n8blog
Bitwise Evolution
Things that make ya go HMMMMM
The NBA Source
 
Donate!
Tsunami relief
Hurricane Katrina relief
Public Television
kjazz 88.1 (listen)
Susan Torres Fund
Wikimedia Foundation
American Red Cross
Habitat for Humanity
United Way
Salvation Army
Friday, March 31, 2006

Peak minutes - what are those?

As I recently mentioned, Jennifer became IN. I knew at the time it'd work wonders for my cell phone bill, but it wasn't until this latest bill that I saw the dramatic difference (this was the first full bill I'd had that she'd been IN the whole time for). I used like no peak minutes whatsoever; they could have cut my peak minutes by damn near 75 percent and I still wouldn't have gone over! Shit was beautiful.

Thursday, March 09, 2006

Whoop That Trick!

I'm officially addicted to "Whoop That Trick" by Djay (off the Hustle and Flow soundtrack). To clarify, an addiction becomes official when you listen to a song more than 100 times in a 24 hour period. I can't stop. Each time if goes off, I just have to listen to it again; once it's over it's as if I've never heard it! Like fine chocolate: you just have to take another bite just see if the bite you just had was really that good!

My initial love for the song started when I saw the movie and watched the three of them produce it. The beat was stupid. The baseline was really outta control. Then Djay comes in talkin'bout "Stomp that Bitch" and, for some strange reason, that was it for me! It's not often you find a hard ass beat, with an even harder hook! I'm not a violent person, but when I heard the beat my subconscious immediately flipped to kill mode. So when Djay threw that hook over it was more than appropriate, it was perfect.

I understand they had to change "stomp that bitch" to "whoop that trick" for radio reasons (this is what they said in the movie anyway), but I was hoping they kept the original hook for the soundtrack. I'm a bit disappointed they didn't. It's probably better that they didn't though, as addicted as I am already I'm not sure what I'd do if it really was "stomp that bitch."

Thursday, March 02, 2006

Subject line etiquette

I an email yesterday with the following subject line:

[CS grads] Sincere apologies if you have received multiple copies of this announcement, an error occurred during the initial transmission [IST Special Seminar, CS Faculty Candidate, Koushik Sen] (Computer Science, University of Illinois, at Urbana-Champaign) - Mar 2 2006 (Thu) 4:00 pm, 74 Jorgensen

Which got me thinking: isn't there a limit to the amount of information you can cram into the subject line of an email? I mean, from a protocol standpoint it would seem to me that there's only so much data you're allowed to stuff in that field… I thought anyway.

More importantly, however, from a sender standpoint isn't there some sort of subject line etiquette? I mean, good God, don't put an entire email in the subject line! The aforementioned email also came with a 7 kilobyte body. Not only is that hard to read (do most email clients display the entire subject line? Most of us probably haven't checked!), but it takes away from the point of the body.

Run that by me one more time

I was reading an article today over at Yahoo! News about bush, foreign policy and the evangelicals (archived if that's dead), and I came across this paragraph:

"Even as many in Washington trumpet the return of realism to US foreign policy and the decline of the neoconservative hawks, the staying power of the evangelicals is likely to blunt what might otherwise have been a steep decline in Wilsonian ideals."

What?!?! That paragraph is awesome! Some (intellectuals I presume) may read that and know what the author was trying to say, but I'm not one of them. I haven't seen words put together like that since Race Matters.